| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Print ] | ||||||||||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||||||
| 0001958 | Old ParaView Bugs | public | 2005-06-21 08:47 | 2005-06-21 08:47 | |||||||||
| Reporter | Jan Linnenkohl | ||||||||||||
| Assigned To | Berk Geveci | ||||||||||||
| Priority | high | Severity | major | Reproducibility | always | ||||||||
| Status | assigned | Resolution | open | ||||||||||
| Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||||||
| Summary | 0001958: Memory consumption | ||||||||||||
| Description | I just looked at the memory consumption of ParaView. I use a 120MB microCT-File as input (size 400*400*400, 16bit, fileformat pvd). Then I have done the following steps: Loading data, median filter, treshold surface (pvclient, pvserver(2), ParaViewCVS version). I hoped, when I run on 2 machines, that the memory consumption is half of the size on each machine, than when I use only one machine (with the processing time this works fine). But it is nearly the same size. So what is the reason for this? Do I need special input data, to minimize memory consumption? | ||||||||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||||||
| Attached Files | |||||||||||||
| Relationships | |
| Relationships |
| Notes | |
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Notes |
| Issue History | |||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| Issue History |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2018 MantisBT Team |