| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Print ] | ||||||||||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||||||
| 0005826 | IGSTK | public | 2007-10-04 11:20 | 2007-10-04 11:20 | |||||||||
| Reporter | Luis Ibanez | ||||||||||||
| Assigned To | |||||||||||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always | ||||||||
| Status | new | Resolution | open | ||||||||||
| Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||||||
| Summary | 0005826: TransductionMacros naming Style | ||||||||||||
| Description | Naming of the Observe..() method is not consistent across the transduction macros | ||||||||||||
| Additional Information | Reported by Vincent Gratsac in the users list http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/igstk-users/2007-October/000273.html [^] I noticed something strange in the following macros : igstkEventTransductionMacro ( event, input ) igstkLoadedEventTransductionMacro ( event, input ) igstkLoadedObjectEventTransductionMacro ( event, input ) In fact, generated "Observe..." public methods are completed with the #event name in the first macro, and with the #input name with the two last ones. public: void Observe##event(const ::itk::Object * object ) public: void Observe##input(const ::itk::Object * object ) | ||||||||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||||||
| Attached Files | |||||||||||||
| Relationships | |
| Relationships |
| Notes | |
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Notes |
| Issue History | |||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2007-10-04 11:20 | Luis Ibanez | New Issue | |
| Issue History |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2018 MantisBT Team |