<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:54 AM, Mike Arthur <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mike@mikearthur.co.uk">mike@mikearthur.co.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Tuesday 17 February 2009 02:24:17 Alan W. Irwin wrote:<br>
> Of course, you can debate forever whether such a SF project would be<br>
> successful or not, but the only way to really know is to try it and see.<br>
> That is, start with something small and expand from there. I don't have<br>
> time to help with such a SF project myself at this time, but I think it is<br>
> a good idea that has a reasonable chance of success, and I would certainly<br>
> be cheering from the sidelines.<br>
</div>I would suggest that we definitely give it a try but perhaps not on<br>
SourceForge, Google Code is far easier to use (in my opinion).</blockquote><div><br>I'd be interested in trying Google Code for a project.<br><br>I'll gather everyone's email addresses that was interested and schedule an IRC planning meeting to discuss some of the project goals and packaging standards. I would like to have consistent ways to enable/disable "make install" for example so that the CMakified packages can be used within someone's source tree or to generate prebuilts.<br>
</div></div><br>-- <br>Philip Lowman<br>