<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/2/13 7:54 PM, Patrick Johnmeyer
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAMM1b9RYxZxFJST7XDOGxtmJ3-x87fH9r-qo43CginQjO-d4rQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Yngve Inntjore
Levinsen <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:yngve.levinsen@gmail.com" target="_blank">yngve.levinsen@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> I think you are
fighting the tool in any case, because you are asking to
build multiple configurations in one build folder (?).
Normally you would create one build folder per
configuration.. Which I guess is what you are doing today.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>No, the Visual Studio generator is not a "<i>single-configuration
generator"</i>. all configurations are bundled into the
single generated solution file. This is the standard behavior
of CMake under "basic" usage.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Your solution using ExternalProject looks promising,
though, I will try this out. Thanks!</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Aha, I have mostly used the Makefile generator, and never VS, so I
didn't know that. I agree, the externalproject trick proposed by
Ansis sounds better. Good luck!<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Yngve<br>
</body>
</html>