<div dir="ltr"><div>Well it is indeed possible and it works... Note that static libraries 's object files are built with unresolved symbols. Final resolution is performed when building executable<br></div><div>Therefore libB can compile without libC and conversely ...<br>
</div><div>Anyone else ?<br></div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Ansis Māliņš <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ansis.malins@gmail.com" target="_blank">ansis.malins@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="im">><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">libB depends on libC and libC depends on libB.</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">How is that even possible? You compile B and it fails because there's no C yet. You compile C and it fails because there's no B yet.</span></div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>